Posted in humor, robotics on February 28th, 2011 by Samuel Kenyon
Whereas in America we’ve been wasting our robot races on autonomous cars that can drive on real roads without causing Michael Bay levels of collateral damage, Japan has taken a more subtle approach.
Their “history making” bipedal robot race involves expensive toy robots stumbling through 422 laps of a 100 meter course, which is followed by visually tracking colored tape on the ground (I’m making an assumption there–the robots may actually be even less capable than that). This is surely one of the most ingenious ways to turn old technology into a major new PR event.
I assume they weren't remote controlling these "autonomous" robots during the race.
Unfortunately, I don’t have any video or photos of the 100 meter course; instead I have this:
And the winner is…Robovie PC! Through some uncanny coincidence, that was operated by the Vstone team, the creators of the race.
Robovie PC sprints through the miniature finish line. The robots on the sides are merely finish line holder slaves.
The practical uses of this technology are numerous. For instance, if you happen to have 42.2 km of perfectly level and flat hallways with no obstructions, one of these robots can follow colored tape around all day without a break(down), defending the premises from vile insects and dust bunnies.
There's no doubt that in the next competition, they will continue to improve their survival capabilities.
Posted in culture, humor on February 21st, 2011 by Samuel Kenyon
Yesterday I attended the 48th episode of Boskone, a science fiction literature convention held in Boston. I found that Boskone was not just about books however, illuminating me with discussion panels such as “The Five Definitive Criteria By Which SF Cinema Is to Be Judged.”
Warning: This blog post is about to get silly.
The panel consisted of Esther Friesner, Craig Shaw Gardner (lord of obscure SF movies), Ginjer Buchanan, and Bruce Coville.
1. Is there a hot babe in a skintight and/or revealing future-suit?
2. Is there a gorilla?
Bride of the Gorilla
3. Is there a robot?
The Gunslinger (Yul Brynner) from Westworld
4. Does any character have Way Cool mind powers?
Big Trouble in Little China
5. Does a planet get blown up?
This shit just got real.
The gorilla requirement forced the large part of the discussion into the realm of cheap B movies such as Rock ‘N’ Roll Wrestling Women Vs. the Aztec Ape. In fact, the only two non-B movies featuring gorillas I can think of off the top of my head are Congo and Mighty Joe Young.
Of course, if you stretch the definition of gorilla to include other kinds of apes, you can start considering the Planet of the Apes movies and 2001: A Space Odyssey. But even those don’t meet all the criteria. Many movies get 4/5, for instance Star Trek (2009) and Forbidden Planet.
The most obvious movie that can meet all five criteria is Star Wars: Episode IV, if “gorillas” is stretched to include Wookies.
I pointed out to the panel that if we include TV series, then Aqua Teen Hunger Force has definitely met all five criteria. I didn’t mention the ATHF movie, Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters, because I don’t think it featured any planets being blown up or a gorilla.
Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters
Hopefully they will rectify that in the ATHF sequel Death Fighter, planned for release in summer 2012. And in case you were wondering, rumors have it that Bruce Campbell will return to voice Chicken Bittle. Thus, once again I have an excuse to end a blog post with that grand sci-fi thespian.
And yes, I realize I shouldn’t have even bothered to watch it once I realized it was for a mainstream news outlet, but several people in my Twitter lists were tweeting it.
Unfortunately, this video turned out not to be for nerds or anyone who has ever thought about future robots or the Singularity. This video is for mainstream sheep. The only glimmer of hope was when he started pursuing the thread of asking why humans have this tendency to punish themselves in robot stories with a father figure or in the manner of Frankenstein. After a couple seconds of that we’re dropped back into cliché city with “robot uprisings.”
The Roomba is mentioned—and then—holy shit, iRobot makes military robots too! OMG! Wait…everybody knows that already. Big deal. I guess Time readers/watchers are really behind the…times. And sure, I’m not being fair—Time readers may not have heard of every robot company, after all. Thank goodness this video shows Big Dog and Robonaut, two unrelated robots made by other companies, wedged in between the iRobot clips while Malow lobs the old joke at us that the cleaning robots will decide to kill humans.
Sure, it’s supposed to be funny. But it’s not, because it’s unoriginal and out of date and/or not real enough (some humor is effective because it’s so close to the truth). As William Zinsser said of humor writers:
They’re not just fooling around. They are as serious in purpose as Hemingway or Faulkner—in fact, a national asset in forcing the country to see itself clearly.
Occasionally I do see a humor piece on the web that achieves this, sometimes even from big places like Cracked.com or The Onion.
Partly, it’s just a matter of taste. Surely some people found Malow’s robot/singularity video funny; after all, millions of people out there paid money to see Meet the Fockers and Little Fockers. Millions of people…laughing when they’re told to at tired jokes and clichés.
Of course, maybe it’s too difficult to be funny with robots—you have to be creative and you’re not sure what your target audience will grok. But, please, if you’re going to make yet another joke about the “robot uprising,” at least make it a new joke.
If you think I’m biased against people making fun of robots or my company, think again: The Daily Show beat Malow to the punch and made fun of iRobot in 2009 (“Roombas of Doom“), and it was much funnier than Malow’s attempt, although still very far removed from reality:
So why do I even bother ranting about mainstream tropes and lack of creativity? Well, the problem is it’s infecting even those not in the mainstream. Almost every person, even if they are scientists or engineers, seems to be obligated to mention AI overlords and robot uprisings as if there are no possible other hooks available. Every single military robot related article I have seen on the Internet mentions Terminator. It’s as if the bulk of our culture has been reduced to a mere handful of common concepts, and more and more people are being sucked into this pit of mental inbreeding.
Posted in culture, humor on September 14th, 2010 by Samuel Kenyon
Christopher Nolan’s Inception has spawned some interesting things on the intertubes.
Behold this infographic by Rick Slusher showing the paths of the characters through the nested dreams (and who hosted each dream):
Surely that would make Tufte proud and warrants as much attention as Charles Joseph Minard’s famous graphic showing the time-place losses of Napoleon’s army during the Russian campaign of 1812…
…and more than matches xkcd’s movie chart excellence:
As a curious comparison, here is director Christopher Nolan’s own diagram:
Here is another Inception graphic–it shows the same info in a different way, although it doesn’t get across the time duration increases as the first graphic does. It also states that Fischer hosted Limbo which disagrees (I think) with Nolan’s diagram.